Lee Anderson has taken a swipe at the Lib Dems as they prepare to sing an expletive-laden anti-Brexit song at their conference tonight.

Reform MP Lee Anderson (Image: GETTY)

Activists have rewritten a version of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious from Mary Poppins featuring the lyric: “It’s b******s-b*****y-b****r-knackers-f*****g-c**t to Brexit, we’ll leave them in no doubt that we’re the party that rejects it.

“When you swear like dockers, you know everyone respects it, b******s-b*****y-b****r-knackers-f*****g-c**t to Brexit.”

The song is set to be sung by Lib Dem members and MPs at their Glee Club event on the last night of the party’s autumn conference in Brighton.

In a quip referring to the lyrics of another Mary Poppins song, Reform MP Mr Anderson said: “I think the Lib Dems need a ‘spoonful of British sugar to help the Brexit medicine go down’.”

The infamous Glee Club event features rewritten versions of popular songs.

The tunes are written by party activists from the satirical Liberator magazine, with the anti-Brexit ditty a new addition to the Liberator Song Book this year.

Mr Anderson, who represents Ashfield, last year branded the Lib Dem gathering as a “freak show”.

His comment came after activists penned a new version of the Three Lions football song for Glee Club, with the new lyrics demanding the UK rejoin the EU.

Instead of the “it’s coming home” chant, the rewritten tune said: “We’ll go back in.”

Mr Anderson said at the time: “A big thanks to the Daily Express for ruining my week away by reminding me of the political freak show that has been taking place in Bournemouth.

“It sounds like the whole of the Lib Dem parliamentary party will be leaving on their one minibus while singing their new silly songs. Ed Davey is no Ed Sheeran.”

Reform leader Nigel Farage branded the new anti-Brexit song as “rather vulgar”.

He told The Telegraph: “For a party that tries to pretend they’re nice all the time, they strike me as being rather vulgar.”

SEE MORE : 

Labour civil war as Angela Rayner’s workers’ rights reforms are opposed by top colleague

The Labour Party is facing an enormous row over plans to introduce extreme workers reforms, which businesses have already warned could do “real damage” to the economy.

Angela Rayner is reportedly in a row with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds about the hard-left reforms, with fears from less left-wing members of the government they could put companies off hiring.

Labour’s manifesto committed to a “new deal for working people”, which would include rights to flexible working, ban zero-hours contracts, and fire and rehire.

The row has been sparked by Ms Rayner pushing to guarantee all workers the same rights from day one, including parental leave, sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal.

Businesses are already warning of the cost and regulator burden the bill will create, with one source recently telling the Times that the Bill is like “using a sledgehammer to crack a nut”.

Ms Rayner wants to clobber small businesses with red tape (Image: Getty)

A row has now broken out between Ms Rayner and Mr Reynolds, about when these employment rights should apply to a worker.

The Deputy Prime Minister, one of the few left-wingers still at Sir Keir’s top table, is pushing to have the rights guaranteed from day one of working, regardless of whether the employee is working a probation period.

This could include the right to take their companies to an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal, a right currently reserved for those who have worked somewhere for two years.

Meanwhile, the Business Secretary is pushing for a nine-month wait before workers get some additional rights, while he also reportedly wants a probation period of a year before someone can take their employer to a tribunal for unfair dismissal.

A Whitehall source told the Telegraph: “Day one rights is proving very difficult.

Mr Reynolds is reportedly clashing with Ms Rayner over the plans (Image: Getty)

“Angela is less keen on a longer probation period, Reynolds thinks nine months is reasonable. It’s unclear if an agreement will be reached.”

More awkwardly for the Government, Sir Keir promised that the landmark workers’ rights reforms would be passed within Labour’s first 100 days in Government.

With Sir Keir now on his 73rd day in the top job, this gives his team less than a month to iron out the fundamental differences between Ms Rayner and Mr Reynolds.

A Labour source has stressed that the two ministers are “close friends” and their disagreements are “not acrimonious”.

Businesses are worried about the plans, which they say amount to a ban on probation periods.

Martin McTague, the national chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, said the changes will hit smaller companies the hardest, who employ around 60% of Britain’s workforce.

He said: “The biggest harms will come from ramping up risk and cost when weighing up who and whether to recruit. Formal dismissal process from day one would add to your risk and could cause real damage to the economy.”

“Anyone looking at sky-high economic inactivity and not thinking about how small employers recruit is thinking about the problem in the wrong way.”

The FSB is asking the government to reconsider its position on day one rights, as well as exempt firms with fewer than 250 employees.