News

European country that shames UK energy policy as Britain witlessly races to Net Zero

Having just arrived back from visiting Oslo, I can tell you Norway works wonderfully with one of the highest standards of living in the world. And it does it by fully exploiting its natural resources – exporting oil and gas so it is one of the few economies with an economic surplus.

Picture of a city

Norway is the 7th Happiest place in the world (Image: Getty Images)

So why can’t we do that with our natural energy resources in the UK?

Like Britain, Norway discovered a bounty of oil and gas in the North Sea in the 1960s but, today, rather than now deciding to close down its fields to win some witless race to net zero, it continues to sell most of it abroad to fund its social expenditure.

Most of its electricity for home use comes from hydroelectricity so it can afford to sell its carbon energy around the world. The figures are impressive. It is the third largest exporter of natural gas after Russia and Qatar, the eighth largest exporter of crude oil and has some of the biggest coal reserves in the world.

Sure, some green-minded, middle-class Norwegians feel guilty about this, but their government is sensibly ignoring them, as the wealth generated by exporting carbon fuels means shorter working hours, stronger labour rights and a very generous welfare system. Norway is seventh in the world Happiness Report, whereas the UK is 20th. And, from a green point of view, it has the highest number of electric cars In the world.

Wisely, the Norwegian government has ensured that part of its energy bonanza is channelled into a Government Pension Fund Global with assets of £1.3trillion, thus ensuring all Norwegians benefit from a high spending welfare system. Its public transport system is impressive, frequent and reasonably priced, with elegant trams being an attractive feature of Oslo’s city centre.

picture of city

‘They think it is greener to import energy rather than sell our own around the world’ (Image: Getty Images)

Rather than cutting down on petrochemical exploration, Norway is hoping to make up for a decline in North Sea oil by exploring its Arctic seas.

Why on earth is the UK not doing this with its own below the surface wealth? Instead our government has been captured by green zealots who see no connection between natural wealth and a higher standard of living. Instead, Labour are choking off North Sea oil and gas exploration, shutting down coal mines and steel works.

For some odd reason, they think it is greener to import energy rather than sell our own around the world. If we can make enough electricity from renewables, which seems unlikely without massive subsidies, then we should sell our own oil, gas and coal to pay for our ballooning public sector.

Norwegian common sense means that they’re also able to deal more efficiently with immigration. Having increased over recent years, migrants make up some 17 per cent of the population but most of them are from Poland, Ukraine and Baltic states, drawn by work opportunities.

They have accepted less migrants from failing states. Sensing some migrants were exploiting the system by lying about their places of origin and circumstances, they deployed DNA tests to check family tie claimants and ensure the system was robust helping those on genuine need.

By keeping accurate data on immigrants, they revealed that non-European immigrants were over-represented in the criminal justice system. In order to bring down the costs of imprisoning them, such as providing interpreters, all foreign criminals have been placed in a separate jail for those awaiting deportation after serving their sentence.

They see no point in re-integrating them in to Norwegian society. Perhaps this would be a good idea for the 10,000 foreign criminals housed throughout our UK prisons?

Tại sao Anh quốc có mức phát thải ròng bằng 0 đang phải vật lộn với một số hóa đơn năng lượng cao nhất châu Âu

Norway is a much smaller country than the UK with a population of just over five million and not everything is perfect there. The cost of importing food is high, making prices challenging for local people let alone tourists. Eye-watering prices of alcohol certainly meant I drank less.

But overall the sense of a society at ease with itself is palpable. It has a confidence and generosity coming from a practical approach to its sovereign wealth. It is not part of the EU and can chart its own future which, with the world market for energy being insatiable, looks to continue to be highly prosperous.

If only our government took a similar more practical approach to Britain’s natural wealth, dropped the green fanaticism, and focussed on making the most of our own petrochemical good luck to enrich us all.

SEE MORE : 

‘Another pledge broken!’ Tories and Reform slam Starmer’s huge U-turn on migrant hotels

Sir Keir Starmer is being torn apart after it emerged he is set to break yet another manifesto pledge, this time on housing migrants in hotels.

Labour’s manifesto pledged to “end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds”.

While they did not set a timeframe, Home Office officials were expecting all hotel use for migrants applying for asylum to end within a year of Sir Keir coming to power.

However, this morning it emerged that applicants will now continue to be housed in hotels for up to three years due to the size of the backlog and swathes of migrants continuing to float over the Channel.

The overall backlog stands at about 225,000, an increase of 11,000 since Labour came to power.

What do you think is the right solution to this issue? Should hotel use for migrants be ended? Have your say in our comments section

Keir Starmer Launches Labour Mission On Crime

Sir Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper promised to end the use of migrant hotels (Image: Getty)

Conservative Party Conference 2024 - Day Two

Robert Jenrick tore into Labour’s latest broken promise (Image: Getty)

The news that hotels will now continue to be used provoked fury from opposition politicians.

Tory leadership frontrunner Robert Jenrick said: “Starmer pledged to ‘end asylum hotels’.

“But he scrapped rather than strengthened the Rwanda plan. And in the 88 days he’s been PM, 11,000 illegal migrants have come.

“It’s no surprise then that, under Starmer, we’ll be spending billions on these hotels for years to come.”

Rival James Cleverly, former home secretary, warned that Labour is planning to re-open asylum hotels “because they scrapped Rwanda, have no plan, and over 11,000 illegal migrants have crossed the channel since Labour took office”.

Meanwhile, Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice shared a graphic comparing Sir Keir’s £1.4billion in cuts to winter fuel payments while spending £8.5billion on unemployed immigrants.

He added: “Only Reform UK is on the side of pensioners and the lowest paid.”

Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty fumed that Labour was “not smashing the gangs”, adding: “They’re barely clearing the backlog.

“Over 10,000 more people have arrived in the last three months.”

During the election campaign, the Prime Minister said: “If we were to carry on with this government, we would have the best part of 100,000 asylum seekers in this country, none of whom are being processed.

“That means none of them can be returned, because until you’re processed, you can’t be returned, even if you’ve got no right to be here, being housed in hotels at the taxpayer’s expense.

“I don’t think that’s right and yes we want to turn that around.”

Labour is now trying to pass the buck onto the Conservatives, claiming things are worse first believed before entering Government.

A Labour source told The Times: “We have inherited a completely failed immigration system from the Tories. Including them spending over £700million on Rwanda, and gimmicks that didn’t work.”

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *