No10 ‘shocked’ by scale of Labour fury at plans for £5bn benefits cut and ‘adding safeguards for disabled’ as Rachel Reeves desperately tries to avoid civil war while balancing books_nhy
Spooked ministers are looking at adding safeguards for the most disabled to a plan to cut the amount paid to those too ill to work.
No10 has been ‘shocked’ by the scale of Labour opposition to the proposal to cut disability benefits to save £5bn and get hundreds of thousands of people who can work into jobs.
An announcement on the measures had been expected yesterday, but has been delayed until next week amid a major operation to win over backbench sceptics.
Dozens are said to have used private meetings in No10 to lay out their shock at the level of the cuts planned and urge a rethink.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver her spring statement on March 26, with increased borrowing costs and weak economic growth likely to require spending cuts in order to meet her commitments on managing the public finances.
Curbing the cost of welfare is expected to be among moves to contribute to savings.
The bulk of the savings are likely to come from making it harder to get personal independence payments (PIPS), while disability handouts could be frozen in cash terms.
However ITV News reports today that there could also be a consultation on measures to protect a small group of the most disabled people who receive PIPs.
Sir Keir Starmer yesterday made a personal plea for Labour MPs to back him on benefits cuts as he recalled how his late mother and brother dealt with disabilities.
Sir Keir Starmer yesterday made a personal plea for Labour MPs to back him on benefits cuts as he recalled how his late mother and brother dealt with disabilities.
No10 has been ‘shocked’ by the scale of Labour opposition to the proposal to cut disability benefits to save £5bn and get hundreds of thousands of people who can work into jobs.
He lashed out at the current ‘indefensible’ welfare system as he was challenged over potential cuts during Prime Minister’s Questions this afternoon.
He told MPs: ‘I come from a family that dealt with a disability through my mother and brother over many years.
‘So I do understand the concerns that have been raised… but we inherited a system which is broken.
‘It is indefensible, economically and morally, and we must and we will reform it. We will have clear principles, we will protect those who need protecting.
‘We will also support those who can work, back to work, but Labour is the party of work, we’re also the party of equality and fairness.’
Later in today’s session of PMQs, Sir Keir was told by Labour backbencher Richard Burgon to make the ‘moral’ choice and introduce a wealth tax.
This was instead of ‘making the poor and vulnerable pay’ by cutting benefits for disabled people, the left-wing MP added.
‘Disabled people in my constituency are frightened,’ Mr Burgon told the PM.
‘And they’re frightened because they’re again hearing politicians use the language of tough choices.
‘They know, from bitter experience, when politicians talk about tough choices it means the easy option of making the poor and vulnerable pay.
‘So instead of cutting benefits for disabled people, wouldn’t the moral thing to do, the courageous thing to do, be to make a real tough choice and introduce a wealth tax on the very wealthiest people in our society?’
Sir Keir replied: ‘The party opposite left a broken welfare system, which locks millions out of work, that is indefensible, in my view, economically and morally.
‘Of course, we need to support people who need support, we need to help those who want to work to get back into work, and I think there’s a moral imperative in that.
‘He talks about a wealth tax, we have raised money – the energy profits levy, taxing non-doms, and air passenger duty on private jets.
‘But this isn’t a bottomless pit, and we must kick-start growth to get the economic stability that we need.’
